Dear Oscar Micheaux,
Your film boldly displays multiple lynchings of Black Americans. In these portrayals, the town's mob of white folk gather around what is, to them, a spectacle of sorts. We see white people from all walks of life: children, women, multiple socioeconomic classes, etc. What strikes me about your theatrical depiction is, ironically, the lack of theatrics. That is to say, while performative nuances may have been added for the sake of your film, they simultaneously accentuated the performative nature of actual lynchings. Indeed, white people from all walks of life gathered seemingly gleefully to take part in such an event as a public murder: in fact, the publicity of lynchings (via photography or video) served as a critical tool in showcasing the strength of racial hierarchy in the postbellum era.
In other words, if one takes a photograph
—which is fallaciously considered as an objective truth by many
—and is thereby witness to the smiles that blatantly span across many whites' faces, the limp body of the murdered Black person, and the sheer strength in numbers of the white people, then this "objective" image serves to solidify extant white supremacist ideology. Such propaganda, when targeted at specific audiences, could prove to be efficient rallying calls for white supremacists to mob terror tactics. In this way, the stage for the photograph of a lynching had to be set with care, with all actors in place and all props manipulated accordingly.
Were you ever considering this as you included lynchings in your film? What was the particular light you were hoping to shed on such occasions? That is, what were you most hoping your audience was to pull from those scenes?