Dear Miss Jacobs,
As I read your
experiences within slavery, I’ve been noting statements that have had
particular impact on me. For example, you make the claim that your masters thought
your father “had spoiled his children, by teaching them to feel that they were
human beings.” You make such a powerful claim only a few pages into your
account. What struck me about this statement was the atmosphere of
consciousness surrounding it—your ability to draw these conclusions despite the
constant pressures of indoctrination by white politics and concepts of
objecthood. In this way, it becomes clear to me that you’ve reclaimed, or even defined
for the first time, your agency.
You later
make an additional statement which combines but simultaneously challenges the argument
of “Black inferiority.”
“I admit that the black man is inferior. But what is it that
makes him so? It is the ignorance in which white men compel him to live; it is
the torturing whip that lashes manhood out of him; it is the fierce bloodhounds
of the South, and the scarcely less cruel human bloodhounds of the north, who
enforce the Fugitive Slave Law. They do the work.”
Here you begin
to describe the mechanisms of soul murder, recognizing that without a soul
there is no self, as white men have stripped it forcefully. How did you go about
self-enlightenment in terms of challenging the subtler, and thus particularly
insidious, forms of racism? That is, how did you come to pinpoint the fallacies
found in even basic or seemingly trivial pieces of ideology, despite the
predominance of racist dogma in your everyday life?
Jamie, this is a very well-written post. I particularly like that you discuss the theme of soul murder and take note of how Harriet Jacobs' writes about her sense of agency. I also like your observations about Harriet Jacobs' experiences with subtler forms of racism. In class, we will discuss the challenges that Jacobs' faced in telling her true story while also making it palatable to Northern white readers.
ReplyDelete